Tohono O'odham vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Ute
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Ute
74.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,719,465 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 74.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,547 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 79.4%, a difference of 7.2%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Ute |
Minimum | 13.0% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 87.0% | 94.1% |
Mean | 67.2% | 69.3% |
Median | 72.2% | 75.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.8% | 65.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.1% | 80.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.3% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.2% | 21.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Ute by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 0.83%), Pima (74.8%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |