Alaskan Athabascan vs Kiowa In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Kiowa
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Kiowa
81.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Kiowa In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 81.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,396 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 79.2%, a difference of 2.7%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Kiowa |
Minimum | 26.1% | 45.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 73.9% | 54.5% |
Mean | 79.1% | 76.0% |
Median | 81.2% | 76.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.5% | 69.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.4% | 82.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.9% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Kiowa by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cherokee (81.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Comanche (81.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Mexico (81.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Chickasaw (80.9%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Native/Alaskan (78.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |