Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,603,268 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.70% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 12.4% |
| Range | 18.2% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 4.9% |
| Median | 5.2% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Maltese (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Basques | 86.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |