White/Caucasian vs Jordanian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Jordanian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Jordanians
48.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Jordanian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 584,446,741 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.915 and weighted average of 48.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,389,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 48.4%, a difference of 0.36%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 21.1% | 23.6% |
| Maximum | 56.5% | 83.7% |
| Range | 35.4% | 60.1% |
| Mean | 43.7% | 51.6% |
| Median | 44.7% | 50.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.7% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.4% | 58.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Jordanians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Immigrants from Lithuania (48.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (48.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (48.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Irish (48.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Eastern European (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Northern European (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Samoans | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Irish | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Poles | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 98.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.4% |