Tsimshian vs Jordanian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Jordanian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Tsimshian
Jordanians
48.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Jordanian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358 and weighted average of 48.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,389,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 48.4%, a difference of 0.66%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 21.2% | 23.6% |
| Maximum | 61.9% | 83.7% |
| Range | 40.7% | 60.1% |
| Mean | 47.0% | 51.6% |
| Median | 48.2% | 50.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.3% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.3% | 58.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Jordanians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are British (48.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (48.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (48.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (48.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Eastern European (48.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (48.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (48.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Luxembourger (48.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Tsimshian | 99.5 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| British | 99.5 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Samoans | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Irish | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Poles | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |