Immigrants from China vs Jordanian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Jordanian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants from China
Jordanians
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Jordanian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,566,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,389,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 48.4%, a difference of 0.020%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Jordanian |
Minimum | 26.3% | 23.6% |
Maximum | 73.8% | 83.7% |
Range | 47.4% | 60.1% |
Mean | 51.2% | 51.6% |
Median | 51.3% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.9% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.7% | 58.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Jordanians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North America (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Laotian (48.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Basque (48.4%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Poles | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | China | 98.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | North America | 98.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Laotians | 98.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 98.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | England | 98.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 98.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Canadians | 98.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 48.2% |