Shoshone vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Households
COMPARE
Shoshone
Immigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Shoshone
Immigrants from Lithuania
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
9.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,615,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,713,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.10%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 43.8% | 55.9% |
| Maximum | 88.1% | 80.4% |
| Range | 44.3% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 67.0% | 66.0% |
| Median | 65.9% | 65.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.9% | 62.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 69.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Immigrants from Lithuania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Norwegian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |