Portuguese vs Puget Sound Salish Family Households
COMPARE
Portuguese
Puget Sound Salish
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Portuguese
Puget Sound Salish
65.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Puget Sound Salish Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,986,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 65.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,155,865 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.34%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 36.8% | 52.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 85.1% |
| Range | 63.2% | 32.6% |
| Mean | 68.0% | 66.0% |
| Median | 66.8% | 65.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.3% | 61.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.2% | 70.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Puget Sound Salish by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
| Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |