Portuguese vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Family Households
COMPARE
Portuguese
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Portuguese
Immigrants from Afghanistan
65.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,986,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 65.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.070%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Immigrants from Afghanistan |
| Minimum | 36.8% | 42.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 85.6% |
| Range | 63.2% | 43.4% |
| Mean | 68.0% | 65.1% |
| Median | 66.8% | 66.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.3% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.2% | 70.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Immigrants from Afghanistan by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Burmese (65.7%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |