Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Puget Sound Salish Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
 Puget Sound Salish
 Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Puget Sound Salish
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Puget Sound Salish Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,155,865 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.41%.
 
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Puget Sound Salish | 
| Minimum | 42.3% | 52.5% | 
| Maximum | 85.6% | 85.1% | 
| Range | 43.4% | 32.6% | 
| Mean | 65.1% | 66.0% | 
| Median | 66.8% | 65.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 61.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.4% | 70.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 9.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 7.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 7.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Puget Sound Salish by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households | 
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65  | Exceptional 65.9%  | 
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66  | Exceptional 65.9%  | 
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67  | Exceptional 65.9%  | 
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68  | Exceptional 65.9%  | 
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69  | Exceptional 65.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70  | Exceptional 65.9%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71  | Exceptional 65.9%  | 
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72  | Exceptional 65.8%  | 
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73  | Exceptional 65.8%  | 
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74  | Exceptional 65.7%  | 
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75  | Exceptional 65.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76  | Exceptional 65.6%  | 
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77  | Exceptional 65.6%  | 
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78  | Exceptional 65.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79  | Exceptional 65.6%  | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80  | Exceptional 65.6%  | 
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81  | Exceptional 65.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82  | Exceptional 65.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83  | Exceptional 65.5%  | 
| Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84  | Exceptional 65.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85  | Exceptional 65.4%  |