Colombian vs Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Colombian
Chickasaw
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Colombians
Chickasaw
32.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
31.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colombian vs Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,716,321 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colombians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 32.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%, a difference of 12.6%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colombian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.3% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 63.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.7% | 94.4% |
Mean | 33.1% | 53.6% |
Median | 32.6% | 47.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.3% | 34.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.6% | 70.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 36.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 25.3% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Colombians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Irish (32.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Tlingit-Haida (32.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Fijian (32.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Sudanese (32.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Kenya (32.1%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Germans | 39.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 32.0% |
Welsh | 38.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 32.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 35.5% |
Bermudans | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 35.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 35.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |