Immigrants from Norway vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Celtic
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Celtics
29.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,150,385 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720 and weighted average of 29.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,463,744 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 11.2%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Celtic |
Minimum | 20.3% | 14.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 79.7% | 86.0% |
Mean | 39.6% | 47.2% |
Median | 30.7% | 39.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.5% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.7% | 55.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 24.5% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Netherlands (29.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Argentinean (30.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Italy (29.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Ethiopian (29.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Ugandan (30.1%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Hungary | 93.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Basques | 93.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Scandinavians | 92.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 29.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 92.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 29.8% |
Ethiopians | 91.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 29.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 91.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 29.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 29.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 91.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 29.9% |
Argentineans | 90.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 30.0% |
Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Slovak (33.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |