Ethiopian vs Inupiat Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Inupiat
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Ethiopians
Inupiat
43.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Inupiat Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,091,132 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 43.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,320,700 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 42.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Inupiat |
Minimum | 28.9% | 12.1% |
Maximum | 80.4% | 81.8% |
Range | 51.5% | 69.7% |
Mean | 46.2% | 42.6% |
Median | 43.6% | 43.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.1% | 34.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.7% | 51.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Inupiat by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Nigerian (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (43.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (43.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |