Cree vs Ugandan Family Households
COMPARE
Cree
Ugandan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Cree
Ugandans
62.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Ugandan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,210,457 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647 and weighted average of 62.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%, a difference of 0.97%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cree | Ugandan |
Minimum | 51.1% | 43.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.6% |
Range | 48.9% | 39.5% |
Mean | 67.8% | 63.6% |
Median | 64.8% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.9% | 56.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.7% | 70.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cree and Ugandans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Immigrants from Kenya (62.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Albania (62.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Iroquois (62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and African (62.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |