Tlingit-Haida vs Ugandan Family Households
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Ugandan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Ugandans
61.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Ugandan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,548 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 61.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%, a difference of 0.15%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 41.2% | 43.1% |
| Maximum | 80.0% | 82.6% |
| Range | 38.8% | 39.5% |
| Mean | 62.4% | 63.6% |
| Median | 63.4% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.0% | 56.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.2% | 70.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Ugandans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Indonesian (61.5%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
| Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
| Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 61.3% |