Czechoslovakian vs Croatian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Croatian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Croatians
48.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Croatian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,521,204 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 48.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,518,925 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 48.5%, a difference of 0.080%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Croatian |
| Minimum | 7.6% | 18.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 84.8% |
| Range | 92.4% | 66.7% |
| Mean | 54.5% | 49.2% |
| Median | 53.6% | 50.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.3% | 44.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 65.4% | 54.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.1% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.1% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Croatians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Indonesia (48.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (48.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (48.6%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Bulgarian (48.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Luxembourger (48.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Indonesia (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Basque (48.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Samoans | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Irish | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Poles | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 98.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.4% |