Austrian vs Immigrants from China Family Households
COMPARE
Austrian
Immigrants from China
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Austrians
Immigrants from China
64.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Immigrants from China Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,810,725 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Austrians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 64.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,596,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.36%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Austrian | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 25.0% | 36.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 75.0% | 63.2% |
Mean | 65.8% | 66.8% |
Median | 65.7% | 67.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.0% | 62.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.9% | 74.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Austrians and Immigrants from China by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Uruguayan (64.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Scottish (64.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Syrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |