Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from China Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from China
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from China
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
76.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from China Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,601,267 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.617 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,596,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.23%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 33.3% | 36.8% |
Maximum | 77.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.5% | 63.2% |
Mean | 65.2% | 66.8% |
Median | 66.8% | 67.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.6% | 62.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.7% | 74.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from China by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Syrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |