Tsimshian vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Houma
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Tsimshian
Houma
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,789,508 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 11.8%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Houma |
Minimum | 11.4% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 29.2% | 57.5% |
Range | 17.8% | 47.3% |
Mean | 19.4% | 21.7% |
Median | 15.6% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 22.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Houma by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 7.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |