Tsimshian vs Comanche Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Tsimshian
 Comanche
 Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Tsimshian
Comanche
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Comanche Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,769,309 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 13.4%.
 
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Comanche | 
| Minimum | 11.4% | 6.9% | 
| Maximum | 29.2% | 31.7% | 
| Range | 17.8% | 24.8% | 
| Mean | 19.4% | 20.2% | 
| Median | 15.6% | 19.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 16.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 24.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 8.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 6.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 6.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Comanche by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%), Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 3.8%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Potawatomi (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Apache (14.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Chippewa (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and Native/Alaskan (15.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 15.1%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 15.3%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 15.3%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 15.3%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 15.7%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 16.4%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 16.7%  |