Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Lithuanian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Tsimshian
Lithuanians
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,646,297 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 54.8%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 11.4% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 29.2% | 67.6% |
| Range | 17.8% | 64.7% |
| Mean | 19.4% | 16.1% |
| Median | 15.6% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 12.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Sierra Leonean (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (10.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |