Yugoslavian vs Samoan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Samoan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Yugoslavians
Samoans
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Samoan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,658,107 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.15%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Samoan |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 23.6% | 18.6% |
| Range | 21.6% | 17.1% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 7.0% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Samoans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |