Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Costa Rica
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,663,811 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,259,714 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 15.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.86% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 6.8% |
| Range | 14.5% | 6.0% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 1.3% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Samoan (3.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Europe (3.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Netherlands (3.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (3.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Nepalese (3.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
| German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lithuanians | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Austrians | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Italians | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |