Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Costa Rica
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,388,915 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,259,714 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 15.9%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.86% |
Maximum | 27.9% | 6.8% |
Range | 26.6% | 6.0% |
Mean | 4.8% | 3.2% |
Median | 3.8% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 1.3% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from England (3.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (3.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Western Europe (3.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Lithuanian (3.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Yugoslavian (3.3%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
Yugoslavians | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | England | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lithuanians | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.4% |
Austrians | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.4% |
Italians | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.4% |
Yuman | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.4% |
Hungarians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.4% |
Croatians | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |