Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Costa Rica
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,259,714 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.13%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.86% |
| Maximum | 6.1% | 6.8% |
| Range | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |