Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Costa Rica
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,538,538 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,259,714 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 0.86% | 0.86% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 6.8% |
| Range | 8.2% | 6.0% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |