Syrian vs Maltese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Syrian
 Maltese
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Syrians
Maltese
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Maltese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,278,347 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,465,300 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.50%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Maltese | 
| Minimum | 0.77% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 15.6% | 15.2% | 
| Range | 14.8% | 13.2% | 
| Mean | 6.5% | 6.6% | 
| Median | 5.8% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 2.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Syrians and Maltese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Croatia (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161  | Good 6.1%  |