Lithuanian vs Maltese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Lithuanian
 Maltese
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Lithuanians
Maltese
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Maltese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,829,236 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,465,300 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.020%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Maltese | 
| Minimum | 0.40% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 47.1% | 15.2% | 
| Range | 46.7% | 13.2% | 
| Mean | 9.0% | 6.6% | 
| Median | 7.4% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 7.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 1.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 2.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Maltese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% | 
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% | 
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% | 
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |