Immigrants from Panama vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Alaskan Athabascan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Alaskan Athabascans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,167,736 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 82.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 24.8% | 25.0% |
| Range | 23.7% | 22.1% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 9.0% |
| Median | 4.0% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Yup'ik (5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |