Immigrants from Africa vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Alaskan Athabascan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Alaskan Athabascans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,129,407 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 95.5%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.17% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 14.3% | 25.0% |
Range | 14.1% | 22.1% |
Mean | 2.9% | 9.0% |
Median | 2.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.70% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Nicaraguan (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Central American (2.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Yup'ik (5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |