Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
 Alaskan Athabascan
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Alaskan Athabascans
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,715,422 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 27.8%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Alaskan Athabascan | 
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.9% | 
| Maximum | 17.5% | 25.0% | 
| Range | 15.1% | 22.1% | 
| Mean | 7.3% | 9.0% | 
| Median | 6.1% | 7.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 11.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 5.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Alaskan Athabascans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 14.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 4.1%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 4.2%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 4.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 4.4%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 4.5%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 4.6%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 4.6%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 4.7%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 4.7%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 4.8%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 5.3%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 5.3%  |