South African vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South African
Alaskan Athabascan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South Africans
Alaskan Athabascans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,615 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 73.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 0.31% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 27.3% | 25.0% |
| Range | 27.0% | 22.1% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 9.0% |
| Median | 3.6% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
| Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
| Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Yup'ik (5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |