Kenyan vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Kenyan
Alaskan Athabascan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Kenyans
Alaskan Athabascans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,202,963 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 87.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kenyan | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 7.0% | 25.0% |
| Range | 5.6% | 22.1% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 9.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Kenyans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Yup'ik (5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |