Sioux vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vision Disability
COMPARE
Sioux
Immigrants from Bahamas
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Sioux
Immigrants from Bahamas
2.5%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,049,152 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,644,216 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Immigrants from Bahamas |
| Minimum | 0.034% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 15.7% | 6.2% |
| Range | 15.7% | 5.7% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 0.70% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 0.88% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Immigrants from Bahamas by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Central America (2.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Yakama (2.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Honduran (2.5%, a difference of 0.14%), French American Indian (2.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Puget Sound Salish (2.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and Celtic (2.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.5% |