Sioux vs Bahamian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Sioux
Bahamian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Sioux
Bahamians
2.5%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Bahamian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,049,152 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,669,490 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sioux | Bahamian |
Minimum | 0.034% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 15.7% | 5.5% |
Range | 15.7% | 5.0% |
Mean | 3.2% | 2.5% |
Median | 2.6% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 0.69% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 0.83% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 0.83% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Bahamians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Central America (2.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Yakama (2.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Honduran (2.5%, a difference of 0.14%), French American Indian (2.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Puget Sound Salish (2.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Scotch-Irish (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Chippewa (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cape Verdean (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.5% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 2.5% |