Palestinian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Disability
COMPARE
Palestinian
Immigrants from Western Asia
Disability
Disability Comparison
Palestinians
Immigrants from Western Asia
11.1%
DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,463,663 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,425,808 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.61%.

Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Minimum | 4.0% | 7.4% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 18.8% |
Range | 18.0% | 11.4% |
Mean | 11.6% | 12.1% |
Median | 11.0% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Western Asia by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Belarus (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Russia (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Chilean (11.1%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Brazil (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Ecuadorian (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Chileans | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Palestinians | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |