Palestinian vs Ecuadorian Disability
COMPARE
Palestinian
Ecuadorian
Disability
Disability Comparison
Palestinians
Ecuadorians
11.1%
DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Ecuadorian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,463,663 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,822,544 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.65%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 4.0% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 18.7% |
Range | 18.0% | 13.8% |
Mean | 11.6% | 10.4% |
Median | 11.0% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Ecuadorians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Belarus (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Russia (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Chilean (11.1%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Ecuador (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Chileans | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Palestinians | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |