Mexican American Indian vs Alsatian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Alsatian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Alsatians
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
34.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Alsatian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,548,375 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,680,655 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 2.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 14.2% | 12.1% |
| Range | 13.2% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 4.9% |
| Median | 3.6% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Alsatians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Black/African American (3.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), African (3.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from South Africa (3.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Iraqi (3.1%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
| Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
| Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |