Immigrants from Norway vs Alsatian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
 Alsatian
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Alsatians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Alsatian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,704,469 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,680,655 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 2.0%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Alsatian | 
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.22% | 
| Maximum | 20.5% | 12.1% | 
| Range | 19.1% | 11.9% | 
| Mean | 6.0% | 4.9% | 
| Median | 4.2% | 4.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 2.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 2.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Alsatians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |