Maltese vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
COMPARE
Maltese
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Maltese
Immigrants from Oceania
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
87.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,423,443 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.28%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 45.8% | 8.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.4% |
| Range | 54.2% | 82.6% |
| Mean | 67.8% | 64.5% |
| Median | 67.8% | 67.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.9% | 62.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.0% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Greek (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |