Maltese vs Immigrants from Moldova Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Maltese
 Immigrants from Moldova
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Maltese
Immigrants from Moldova
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Immigrants from Moldova Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,465,300 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,381,325 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.070%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Immigrants from Moldova | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.2% | 
| Maximum | 15.2% | 17.5% | 
| Range | 13.2% | 16.3% | 
| Mean | 6.6% | 6.6% | 
| Median | 6.1% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Moldova by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158  | Good 6.0%  |