Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Japan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Immigrants from Japan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
Immigrants from Japan
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Japan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,652,316 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,950,646 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 0.90%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Immigrants from Japan |
Minimum | 0.43% | 0.20% |
Maximum | 5.3% | 10.6% |
Range | 4.8% | 10.4% |
Mean | 1.7% | 2.3% |
Median | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 2.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.90% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.89% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Japan by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |