Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Sweden Vision Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
 Immigrants from Sweden
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
Immigrants from Sweden
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Sweden Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,652,316 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,685,810 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Immigrants from Sweden | 
| Minimum | 0.43% | 0.27% | 
| Maximum | 5.3% | 6.9% | 
| Range | 4.8% | 6.6% | 
| Mean | 1.7% | 2.1% | 
| Median | 1.6% | 1.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 1.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.90% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.89% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Sweden by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Eastern European (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 1.9%  | 
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 2.0%  | 
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 2.0%  |