Bulgarian vs Burmese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Burmese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Bulgarians
Burmese
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Burmese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,563,576 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,767,032 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 1.8%, a difference of 3.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| Range | 4.9% | 5.4% |
| Mean | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Median | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.69% | 0.43% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.87% | 0.68% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.86% | 0.67% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Burmese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Japan (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bolivian (1.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from China (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |