Latvian vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Carpatho Rusyn
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Latvians
Carpatho Rusyns
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,706,558 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 7.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Carpatho Rusyn |
| Minimum | 0.23% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 28.4% | 19.6% |
| Range | 28.1% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 7.2% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are European (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |