Latvian vs Immigrants from South America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from South America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from South America
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from South America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,706,558 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,161,675 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from South America |
| Minimum | 0.23% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 28.4% | 18.8% |
| Range | 28.1% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 5.6% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from South America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |