Immigrants from Thailand vs Central American Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Central American
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Central Americans
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
8.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Central American Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,791,227 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,524,295 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 0.81%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Central American |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.52% |
Maximum | 6.9% | 4.3% |
Range | 6.1% | 3.8% |
Mean | 3.0% | 2.2% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.94% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.74% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 0.73% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Central Americans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Celtic (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scotch-Irish (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Malaysian (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), French (2.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Alaskan Athabascan (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Panamanian (2.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |