Immigrants from Panama vs Creek Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Creek
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Creek
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Creek Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,167,736 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,433,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 50.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 24.8% | 13.4% |
| Range | 23.7% | 11.8% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 4.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |