Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Ute Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Ute
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Ute
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,316,752 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.27%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North Macedonia | Ute |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 14.9% | 26.5% |
Range | 13.3% | 24.8% |
Mean | 6.6% | 7.6% |
Median | 6.0% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |