Australian vs Ute Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Australian
 Ute
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Australians
Ute
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 3.6%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Ute | 
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.7% | 
| Maximum | 15.8% | 26.5% | 
| Range | 13.3% | 24.8% | 
| Mean | 6.9% | 7.6% | 
| Median | 6.1% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 8.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.1% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
Demographics Similar to Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130  | Excellent 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131  | Excellent 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 6.0%  |